Great Leap Forward
A mass mobilization campaign aimed at rapidly transforming China from an agrarian economy into a communist society through rapid industrialization and collectivization, resulting in widespread famine.
Radical Mobilization
Launched in 1958, the Great Leap Forward was Mao Zedong's attempt to rapidly industrialize China and transition to communism through mass mobilization rather than gradual development. The campaign's twin pillars were the establishment of People's Communes — merging cooperative farms into enormous collective units of tens of thousands — and a crash program to dramatically increase steel output, famously pursued through backyard furnaces in which peasants melted down farming tools and household utensils.
Extravagant production targets were set and falsified reports flowed upward through the political hierarchy. Local officials who reported shortfalls risked punishment; those who fabricated record harvests were rewarded. Grain was procured from villages at rates reflecting fictitious yields, leaving insufficient food for rural populations. Meanwhile, able-bodied labor was diverted from farming to steel production and construction projects.
The Famine
The result was one of the deadliest famines in human history. Scholarly estimates of excess deaths range from 15 to 55 million for the period 1959–1961, with most researchers placing the figure between 30 and 45 million. Starvation was worst in Sichuan, Gansu, Qinghai, and Anhui provinces. At the same time, China continued to export grain throughout the famine years, with annual exports averaging approximately 2.7 million tonnes between 1959 and 1961, further exacerbating domestic food shortages. Evidence of the catastrophe was suppressed; honest reporting by local officials was punished. Peng Dehuai, the defence minister who wrote privately to Mao criticising the policies, was purged at the Lushan Conference in 1959.
Recovery and Reassessment
By 1960–1961 the scale of the disaster had become impossible to ignore. Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping implemented pragmatic recovery policies including restoring private plots and loosening commune controls. Mao stepped back from day-to-day governance but retained supreme political authority. The 1981 Party resolution formally characterised the Great Leap Forward as a "serious error" causing "serious losses," though the scale of mortality has never been officially disclosed in China.
Narrative Comparison
| Source | Narrative |
|---|---|
| PRC Official Narrative (1981 Resolution) | The Great Leap Forward was a serious error that occurred in the Chinese Communist Party's exploration of the path of socialist construction. During the campaign, production targets became severely divorced from reality owing to insufficient understanding of national conditions and economic laws, compounded by the impact of natural disasters, causing major losses to the state and the people. The pragmatist line represented by Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping implemented the 'readjustment, consolidation, filling out and raising standards' policy, gradually correcting the errors of the Great Leap Forward and restoring the national economy. The 1981 Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of Our Party Since the Founding of the People's Republic of China formally characterised the Great Leap Forward as a 'serious error,' attributing principal responsibility to Comrade Mao Zedong's departure in his later years from the ideological line of seeking truth from facts. The Party's honest reckoning with this historical error and its systematic correction reflect the CCP's capacity for self-criticism and self-improvement. |
| Western Academic Assessment | Western historians and demographers have reached broad consensus on the scale and causes of Great Leap Forward mortality: excess deaths for 1959–1961 are estimated at approximately 15 to 55 million, with most estimates concentrated in the range of 30 to 45 million (Coale, 1981; Peng, 1987). Researchers have identified multiple mechanisms driving mass death: unrealistic grain procurement targets that left rural populations with minimal food; the systematic suppression of famine information, with honest reporters punished; deliberate hoarding of grain by local officials in some areas; and continued Chinese grain exports throughout the worst famine years. Dikötter's research (2010), drawing on provincial party and government archives, further argued that mortality was not simply the product of food shortages caused by policy failure, but also included systematic violence, forced labour, and deliberate punishment of those deemed to be shirking — characterising the episode as, in certain respects, a form of mass killing. This characterisation remains contested in the scholarly literature. (Coale, 1981; Peng, 1987; Dikötter, 2010) |
Key Milestones
- CCP Central Committee Adopts People's Communes Resolution; Communisation Launched Nationwide
The CCP Central Committee adopted the Resolution on Establishing People's Communes in Rural Areas, demanding the rapid completion of communisation nationwide. By the end of 1958, over 99% of rural households had been incorporated into approximately 26,000 communes; privately held land, tools, and livestock were all collectivised, and household cooking was replaced by collective canteens.
- Backyard Steel Campaign Peaks; Massive Labour Diversion Leaves Autumn Harvest to Rot
The nationwide backyard steel campaign peaked, with an estimated 90 million rural labourers diverted to steel production. Large quantities of crops were left unharvested and rotted in the fields. The crude steel produced was unusable; farm tools and cooking pots were melted down en masse. Simultaneously, the falsification of grain yields became rampant, with wildly exaggerated 'Sputnik' claims generating the catastrophic procurement targets that followed.
- Lushan Conference: Peng Dehuai Purged for Criticising Great Leap; Famine Warning Channels Sealed
During the Lushan Conference, Defence Minister Peng Dehuai wrote privately to Mao Zedong with measured criticism of reckless aspects of the Great Leap. Mao made the letter public, mobilised conference participants to denounce Peng, and had him purged — then launching a nationwide campaign against 'right opportunism.' The episode sent a clear signal to officials at every level that honest reporting carried political consequences, further blocking famine information channels and directly accelerating the scale of the catastrophe.
- CCP Central Committee Issues Emergency Directive; Great Leap Policies Begin Substantive Retrenchment
The CCP Central Committee issued the 'Emergency Directive Letter on Current Policy Questions in Rural People's Communes' (the 'Twelve Articles'), acknowledging problems with collective canteens and deep ploughing, and requiring the restoration of private plots and peasant autonomy. This marked the beginning of substantive retrenchment in Great Leap policies, with the pragmatist faction led by Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping taking the lead on agricultural recovery. By this point, however, tens of millions had already died in the nationwide famine.
Sub-Events
Great Chinese Famine
A combination of collectivisation policies, unrealistic grain procurement quotas, natural disasters, and suppression of accurate reporting caused the largest famine in human history, with scholarly death toll estimates ranging from 15 to 55 million.
Lushan Conference and Dismissal of Peng Dehuai
At the Lushan Party plenum, Defence Minister Peng Dehuai privately criticised the Great Leap Forward's failures in a letter to Mao; Mao made the letter public, had Peng labelled a "right opportunist," and dismissed him—silencing internal dissent at a critical moment.
Socialist Education Movement
Launched in 1963 ostensibly to combat rural cadre corruption and 'capitalist tendencies,' the Socialist Education Movement (Four Cleanups) rapidly became the arena for a fundamental political conflict between Mao Zedong and Liu Shaoqi: Liu sought disciplined work-team procedures focused on local corruption, while Mao's Twenty-Three Points redirected the movement against 'capitalist roaders within the Party' at all levels. This factional dispute was a direct precursor to the Cultural Revolution and established the templates — mass struggle sessions, urban work teams sent to villages, mobilisation of poor peasants against 'class enemies' — that defined Cultural Revolution mass campaigns.
Last verified: