Household Responsibility System
Replacing collective farming, this system allowed farming households to lease land from the state and sell surplus produce on the open market, dramatically increasing agricultural productivity.
Origins in Xiaogang Village
The Household Responsibility System effectively began not as a top-down policy but as a desperate act of self-preservation by 18 farmers in Xiaogang Village, Fengyang County, Anhui Province in November 1978. Facing starvation after years of collective farming, they secretly signed a contract in red fingerprints to divide commune land among individual households and commit to meeting state quotas from private production — with the understanding that if arrested, the community would care for their children. Their harvest the following year exceeded the previous five combined.
National Adoption
Knowledge of the Xiaogang experiment spread, and similar arrangements emerged spontaneously in other areas. Deng Xiaoping cautiously endorsed local experiments, and the system was formally legitimised through a series of "No. 1 Documents" issued from 1982 onward. By 1984 virtually all of China's agricultural land had been distributed to households under long-term use contracts. Collective farming had been effectively dismantled — though technically land remained state-owned — and the people's commune system was abolished.
Impact
The results were dramatic. Agricultural output rose sharply: grain production increased from 305 million tons in 1978 to 407 million tons by 1984. Rural incomes grew substantially. The system's success also released a large surplus labour force that would migrate to coastal factories and construction sites, providing the manpower for China's subsequent industrial boom. The Xiaogang farmers are celebrated in China today as pioneers of reform.
Narrative Comparison
| Source | Narrative |
|---|---|
| PRC Official Narrative | The rural reform centred on the Household Responsibility System was a major historic breakthrough in the Party's agricultural policy, and a great creation by hundreds of millions of farmers under the Party's leadership. Responding to the objective laws governing the development of agricultural productive forces and to the urgent aspirations of the broad mass of farmers to escape poverty and improve their lives, the Party Central Committee resolutely implemented the Household Responsibility System, granting farmers full autonomy in production and management, organically integrating the farmers' responsibilities, rights, and interests, fully mobilising their enthusiasm for production, and liberating and developing rural productive forces. From the spontaneous explorations of Xiaogang Village farmers in 1978, to the Party Central Committee's endorsement and promotion through a series of 'No. 1 Documents,' to the lawful abolition of the people's commune system, this historical process vividly embodies the Party's fine traditions of seeking truth from facts and following the mass line, as well as the creative wisdom of combining the basic principles of Marxism with China's agricultural realities. The Household Responsibility System was an important breakthrough in rural reform, laying a solid foundation for the entire cause of reform and opening-up, and constituting an important component of agricultural policy with Chinese characteristics. |
| Western Academic Analysis | Western scholarship on the Household Responsibility System has concentrated on three main issues. The first concerns the attribution of reform momentum: the dominant view holds that decollectivisation had a significantly bottom-up character — farmers in Xiaogang and elsewhere initiated arrangements that preceded central policy — and that the Party's role was primarily to endorse and disseminate changes that had already occurred at the grassroots, rather than to design and implement a pre-conceived programme. The second concerns the drivers of performance: the large increase in grain output between 1978 and 1984 is well documented, but scholarly debate continues over the mechanisms — the contribution of institutional change (decollectivisation) per se, the substantial concurrent rise in state procurement prices for agricultural products, and increased fertiliser inputs are difficult to disaggregate, and some research suggests that price reform contributed as much to output growth as changes in property rights. The third concerns the construction of the official narrative: the Xiaogang story has undergone considerable symbolic elaboration in official history, serving as the central emblem of a 'reform breaking through from the grassroots' narrative, while similar spontaneous practices elsewhere have received less attention. In the longer term, household contracting substantially raised productive efficiency but also generated structural constraints — including land fragmentation and limits on economies of scale — that have remained persistent themes in agricultural policy discussions over the following decades. |
Key Milestones
- No. 1 Central Document Issued; Household Responsibility System Formally Established
On 1 January 1982, the CCP Central Committee issued the Summary of the National Rural Work Conference — the 1982 'No. 1 Document' — formally affirming for the first time in a central document that 'contracting output to households' and 'contracting all to households' were forms of socialist collective economy, and establishing the institutional framework for rural reform over the following years. Following the spontaneous experiment by Xiaogang Village farmers in 1978, this marked the first formal national endorsement of the Household Responsibility System, transforming a local experiment into a nationally sanctioned programme. Central No. 1 Documents continued to focus on agricultural reform in 1983, 1984, and 1985, systematically advancing the transformation of the rural economic system.
- State Council Issues Notice on Separating Government and Commune Functions; People's Commune System Begins Dissolution
In October 1983, the State Council issued a notice requiring the nationwide phased abolition of the people's communes and the establishment of township people's governments, restoring the normal structure of rural grassroots government. This marked the beginning of the end for the people's commune system that had persisted for nearly twenty-five years since the Great Leap Forward of 1958, representing a fundamental transformation of rural grassroots governance. By the end of 1984, the separation of government administration from commune management had been substantially completed nationwide and township governments had been widely established.
- No. 1 Central Document Extends Land Contract Period to Fifteen Years
The 1984 'No. 1 Document' stipulated that land contract periods should generally be fifteen years or longer, with extended terms for projects with longer production cycles or development projects, and permitted the transfer of contract rights during the contract period. By granting farmers stable long-term land use rights, this measure removed concerns about policy changes and further encouraged investment in agricultural production, while creating the institutional conditions for the transfer of surplus rural labour to non-agricultural employment. With this, the Household Responsibility System was fully and stably extended across the country, and the dismantling of the collective agricultural system was substantially complete.
Last verified: